Green Zone : A question for the character

I liked this movie…. Very much. In addition to many other elements of a good movie, I encountered the Chief encountering similar questions, such as we were dealing with during the Ethics class cases in my MBA. On 14th minutes of the movie, despite being told that he should not question around the genuinely of the sources, Chief questioned the same. He was leading this operation sacredly and was wondering the upstream input from Intelligence. So, the big question is “What you would do, if your environment stops you from questioning the decisions taken by others, despite the fact it effects your personal values and work?” I am now thinking about it, but more importantly I want to see the movie further, so give me few minutes….

Few minutes later….



Till it is streaming:

He questioned and I suspect that I might do the same. But he is risking his position in the settlement. Many people around will not like him and might want him removed. Now, what are his options?: 1. He gives this politics some time (and that’s what happens most of the time, due to which things doesn’t move further as quick as they could), 2. He doesn’t bother and move further as best he can. I suspect he would do this in this movie…, lets go back there…


After an hour or more …

Now the feared has been done, The Chief is outlined, although in this case, as he found some supporters, who would help him since their objectives are same i.e. to find the truth i.e. to do the right thing. So it is back to politics and muscles wriggling between two groups against a common enemy.

The movie is as interesting as Bourne series. I liked it much, but in India I can not find the DVD as cheap as less than 1 USdollar as I could in China. I dislike this… thank god, YouKu is there… hehe…

And in the end, he did what best he did. He made the truth open; which was coherent with his thinking. It needed courage.

Absolutely fantastic movie…. Full of concentration and depth. The only think which I did not like was the ending Music though, not as good as in previous Greengrass’s blockbusters.

How does BCG gets project from BSNL?

BCG has recently done a study for "Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited" (BSNL), the fifth largest mobile operator in India. BSNL is semi- overnment telecom operator in India, the only one untill few years back. And it is losing market share to private operators. I remember that 15 years back when the phone was a luxury in India, BSNL was the only provider of landline phones, so if there is any problem with your connection such as the open hanging telephone line from pole to your home is damaged by a monkey, next morning you have to go and wait for the BSNL lineman to come and fix it. Additionally you have to give him some "kharcha paani"(accepted bribe). The situation is widely understood to be same (for bribes) from lineman (the lowest in hierarchy) to the top bosses (either executives or minister responsible). The result of this unholistic approaches widely taken over the years, looking only at short term face saving fixes (and personal gains), BSNL is a loss making company and going down. BCG, on the contrary is an epitom of professionalism. BCG like consulting firms and Cisco like vendors works usually with the givernment firms like BSNL. Then What Happens ?

I am putting some thought points but also would urge the reader to add anything as comments freely...

We can analyse on many issues:

1. Who benefits: BSNL does for sure. But does Cisco gets something from BSNL? Has BSNL something which Cisco needs to learn?

2. Are these deals bribe free? BCG is supposedly ethical, but for BSNL consulting projects, Will BCG like to pay upto 1 M USD to various officials for getting the contract?

3. What is the future of such governmental organisations? Can under monopoly systems (such as in China) they learn to complete projects within time and upto satisfaction? (Indian common wealth games vs. China Olympics/ Indian railways vs. China's transportation services).

And many more to see....